AI and intelligence

Q: describe briefly what you think are different components of intelligence and make a table with these components and assess the relative advantage or score of AI versus humans on this component

A: The result is in the picture below.

Put simply, this gives as strongest advantages:
๐—”๐—œ: memory โ†’ reasoning โ†’ abstraction โ†’ information processing โ†’ language
๐—›๐˜‚๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜€: judgment โ†’ adaptability โ†’ metacognition โ†’ social intelligence โ†’ real-world learning

Moreover, intelligence itself does not tell us what an intelligent system wants. A system could score 5/5 across every dimension of intelligence and still have virtually no intrinsic purpose of its own. This may be one of the most fundamental differences between biological intelligence and present-day AI.

This brings me to two hypotheses that I think deserve more attention:
๐—›๐˜†๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐Ÿญ: Intelligence has multiple dimensions. In some of these, humans still outperform AI; in others, humans bring a fundamentally different perspective. Saying that AI is simply โ€œmore intelligentโ€ than humans is therefore an oversimplification.
๐—›๐˜†๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐Ÿฎ: Even if AI surpasses humans across many dimensions of intelligence, this does not necessarily imply dominance over humanity. Intelligence alone does not create ambition: if AI has little intrinsic purpose, desire for control, or need for social connection, superior intelligence may not translate into a drive to dominate.

Iโ€™d be very interested to hear your thoughts: agree, disagree, or somewhere in between? Let me know in the comments.